Bibliographie
Barrow, J., “From the Lease to the Certificate: the evolution of Episcopal Acta in England and Wales (c.700-c.1250)”, in Die Diplomatik der Bischosurkunden vor 1250, J.C. Haidacher and W. Köfler (eds.), Innsbruck, 1995, p. 529-542.
Barrow, J., English Episcopal Acta 35: Hereford 1234-1275, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, CI + 275 p.
Brooke, C.N.L., “English Episcopal Acta of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries”, in Medieval Ecclesiastical Studies in Honour of Dorothy M. Owen, M. J. Franklin and C. Harper-Bill (eds.), Woodbridge, Boydell and Brewer, 1995, p. 41-56.
Brown, W., Register of Walter Giffard, lord archbishop of York, 1266-1279, London, Surtees Society, 1904, XIX + 362 p.
Brown, W., The Register of William Wickwane, lord archbishop of York, 1279-1285, London, Surtees Society, 1907, XXVI + 412 p.
Brown, W., The register of John le Romeyn, lord archbishop of York, 1286-1296, part I, London, Surtees Society, 1913, 416 p.
Brown, W., The registers of John le Romeyn, lord archbishop of York, 1286-1296, part II, and of Henry of Newark, lord archbishop of York, 1296-1299, London, Surtees Society, 1917, XLIII + 365 p.
Burger, Michael, “Sending, joining, writing and speaking in the Diocesan Administration of Thirteenth-century Lincoln”, Mediaeval Studies, 55, 1993, p. 151-182.
Cheney, C.R., English Bishops’ Chanceries 1100-1250, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1950, 188 p.
Cheney, C.R., From Becket to Langton English Church Government 1170-1213, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1956, 222 p.
Churchill, I., Canterbury Administration, London, SPCK, 1933, 2 vols, XIII + 615 p., XV + 367 p.
Churchill, I., “The Archbishops’ Registers”, in Medieval Records of the Archbishops of Canterbury, E.G.W. Bill (ed.), London, Faith Press, 1962, 70 p.
Clanchy, M., From Memory to Written Record, 2nd ed., Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 1992, 432 p.
Davis, F.N., Rotuli Roberti Grosseteste Episcopi Lincolniensis AD MCCXXXV-MCCLIII, London, Canterbury and York Society, 1914, XII + 557 p.
Denton, J. and Hoskin, P. M., English Episcopal Acta 43: Coventry and Lichfield 1223-1256, Oxford, Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
Denton, J. and Hoskin, P. M., English Episcopal Acta 44: Coventry and Lichfield 1258-1295, Oxford, Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
Forrest, I., ‘The archive of the official of Stow and the ‘machinery’ of church government in the late thirteenth century’, Historical Research, 84, 2011, p. 1-13.
Foster, C.W., ‘The Lincoln Episcopal Registers’, Reports and Papers of the Architectural and Archaeological Societies of the County of Lincoln and the County of Northampton, 41, 1935, p. 155-168
Fowler, R.C., Episcopal Registers of England and Wales, London, Dawson, 1918, 32 p.
Frankforter, A.D., “The origin of Episcopal Registration procedures in Medieval England”, Manuscripta, 26, 1982, p. 67-89.
Hamilton Thompson, A., ‘The Registers of the Archbishops of York’, Yorkshire Archaeological Journal, 32, 1936, p. 245-263.
Hass, E. de, and Hall, G.D.G. Early Registers of Writs, Selden Society, 1970, 430 p.
Hill, R.M.T., “Bishop Sutton and his archives: a study in the keeping of records in the 13th century”, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 2, 1951, p. 43-53.
Hill, R., “Schalby, John (d. 1333)”, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.
Hoskin, P.M., English Episcopal Acta 38: London 1229-1280, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, CXVI + 160 p.
Jenkins, C., Ecclesiastical Records, London, SPCK, 1920, 84 p.
Kemp, B.R., English Episcopal Acta 36: Salisbury 1229-1262, ed. B.R. Kemp, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, CXXXVI + 261 p.
Kemp, B.R., English Episcopal Acta 37: Salisbury 1263-1297, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010, XXXII + 380 p.
Logan, F.D., Excommunication and the Secular Arm in Medieval England, Toronto, Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1968, 259 p.
Major, K., A Handlist of the Records of the Bishop of Lincoln and of the Archdeacons of Lincoln and Stow, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1953, 122 p.
Phillimore, W.P.W., Rotuli Hugonis de Welles, Episcopi Lincolniensis, 1209-1235 vol. 1, London, Canterbury and York Society, 1903, XXVII + 209 p.
Raine, J., The Register or Rolls of Walter Gray, Lord Archbishop of York, 1215-1255, London, Surtees Society, 1872, LVIII + 388 p.
Smith, D.M., ‘The rolls of Hugh of Wells, bishop of Lincoln 1209-35’, Bulletin of Historical Research, 45, 1972, p. 155-195.
Smith, D.M., Guide to Bishops’ Registers of England and Wales: a survey from the Middle Ages to the Abolition of the Episcopacy in 1646, London, Royal Historical Society, 1981, 352 p.
Smith, D.M., The Acta of Hugh of Wells, bishop of Lincoln 1209-1235, Woodbridge, Lincoln Record Society, 2000, 310 p.
Swanson, R.N., ‘The rolls of Roger de Meuland, bishop of Coventry and Lichfield (1258-1295), Journal of the Society of Archivists, 11, 1990, p. 37-41.
Haut de page
Notes
Cheney, 1950, p. 98.
On the late introduction of registers see Churchill, 1933, p. 4; Churchill, 1962, p. 12; Jenkins, 1920, p. 41; Cheney, 1950, p. 108-109; Cheney, 1956, p. 65; Raine, Register Gray, p. viii; Phillimore, Rotuli Welles, p. 1; Fowler, p. 103; Foster, 1935, p. 155-156; Frankforter, 1982, p. 67-89.
Kemp, English Episcopal Acta 36, p. cii; Hoskin, English Episcopal Acta 38, p. cvi-cvii.
For a detailed discussion of significations, see Logan, 1968.
Ibid., p. 66.
Ibid., p. 148.
Barrow, English Episcopal Acta 35, p. xcvi; Hoskin, English Episcopal Acta 38, p. cxv.
For York significations see TNA, C 85/169, C 85/170, C 85/171, C 85/172 C 85/173, C 85/174, C 85/175; C 85/153/38.
Borthwick Institute for Archives, Archbp Reg. 1, edited Raine, Reg. Gray.
Borthwick Institute for Archives, Archbp Reg. 2, edited Brown, Reg. Giffard.
Smith, 1981, p. 234; Frankforter, 1982, p. 87.
Borthwick Institute for Archives, Archbp Reg. 3 and Archbp Reg. 4, edited Brown, Register Wickwane and Brown, Register Romeyn.
TNA, C 85/173/18 and 90.
TNA, C 85/172/53, 56, 57, 59, 60, 62-65; C 85/173/1-4, 6, 7, 9-14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 23, 24, 26, 28-33, 35-39, 41, 44, 47, 49, 51, 52, 54-59, 60-61, 65-68, 71-88, 92; C 85/174/2-13, 16, 17, 22-24, 26, 28-32, 34-36, 41-44, 46, 48, 49.
TNA, C 85/173/76 and 77.
TNA, C 85/173/65-68, 71-77.
TNA, C 85/172/50, 52, 54, 58; C 85/173/5, 8, 15, 21, 22, 25, 27, 34, 40, 42, 43, 45, 48, 50, 53, 62-64, 69, 70; C 85/174/14, 18-21, 40, 45, 47.
TNA, C 85/173/62-64, 69, 70.
TNA, C 85/174/43 on; C 85/175.
TNA, C 85/175/23.
TNA, C 85/175/44; C 85/175/49; C 85/175/47-69. In 1288, John Nassington as vicar-general makes use of the standard archiepiscopal form when issuing significations in the archbishop’s absence (TNA, C 85/174/49, 50, 52-59): he would have had access to the bishop’s chancery but probably not a separate chancery of his own.
Smith, 1981, p. 234.
Hamilton Thompson, 1936, p. 249.
Brown, Register Wickwane, p. 303.
For a description see Hamilton Thompson, 1936, p. 249.
Borthwick Institute for Archives, Archbp Reg. 4, fo. 69r. Bracketed letters are the alternative plural endings interlined in the manuscript.
Cheney, 1950, p. 107.
Smith, 1972, p. 155-195.
On Hugh of Well’s chancery see Smith, 2000, p. xxxii-xxxiv.
TNA, C 85/97. TNA, C 85/97/1 declares itself to be dated 1206: but the hand, and the fact that it is issued in the name of H. bishop of Lincoln, demonstrate that this is a scribal error for 1256 and the document was actually issued under Henry of Lexington.
TNA, C 85/97/3-5, 7, 11, 17, 20, 24, 26, 70. Printed Davis, Rotuli Grosseteste…, p. 504.
TNA, C 85/101/ 2, 3, 4, 5, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 26, 27, 29, 31, 33, 34, 36, 38, 42, 43, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 59; C 85/100/75.
TNA, C 85/101/1, 6, 7, 9-10, 12, 19, 20, 28, 32, 35, 39, 40, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 53, 56, 57, 58, 61, 62, 64, 67.
On careful use of language in these rolls see Michael Burger, ‘Sending, Joining, Writing and Speaking’…, p. 151-182.
Frankforter, 1982, p. 86.
Phillimore, Rotuli Welles…, p. iii; Davis, Rotuli Grosseteste… contains a number of references to missing rolls including memoranda rolls.
Hill, 2004.
The author’s forthcoming new edition of the rolls of Robert Grosseteste, bishop of Lincoln, will demonstrate the ways in which the chancery attempted to make the rolls easier to consult and that these were not contemporary with the rolls’ production. Consultation was clearly not the main concern at point of creation.
Cheney, 1951, p. 108.
Major, 1953, p. 38.
I am grateful to Dr Nicholas Bennett, Lincoln Cathedral Librarian, for this information concerning the contents of later Lincoln episcopal registers.
Hill, 1951, p. 44; Forrest, 2011, p. 5.
TNA, C 85/71, C 85/72 and C 85/73.
TNA, C 85/71/21-41, C 85/72/1-36.
TNA, C 85/73/2, dated 1292, is an example.
Smith, 1981, p. 77.
See Kemp, English Episcopal Acta 36, p. cxxxv-cxxxvi; Swanson, 1990, p. 37-40.
Denton & Hoskin, English Episcopal Acta 43, nos. 219–221, 223-224, 276-282; Denton & Hoskin, English Episcopal Acta 44, nos. 338, 340-354, 356-380, 383-390, 395-417, 419-420, 423-431, 433-438; TNA, C 85/52/1, 2, 4-14, 17-22, 25-34; C 85/53/1-22, 25-42, 45-49, 51-53; C 85/54/1-38, 40; C 85/55/19.
Denton & Hoskin, English Episcopal Acta 44, nos. 439, 441-446, 448-459, 462-470, 472-482, 484-488, 491-494, 496-500, 503, 508-515; TNA, C 85/54/39, 42-51, 53, 54-57; C 85/55/1, 3, 5-18, 20-31, 33-34, 36-37, 40-49.
The inscriptio is usually the same as that under Weasenham, addressing the king as Excellentissimo usually followed by domino suo, and early in the episcopate Wesenham’s salutation is used twelve times (TNA, C 85/52/7-18) but is then replaced by a variety of forms although the most common is ‘successus [semper] ad vota prosperos [iugiter] et felices’ (the bracketed words reflecting frequent but not invariable additions) whilst the valedcition varies and is often replaced with a corroborative clause referring to sealing from 1276 on.
Kemp, English Episcopal Acta 37, nos. 294, 296-299, 305, 307-310, 312-316, 318-333, 336-342, 381, 383-386, 415, 432. Interestingly this form is not used in the significations which are issued by the bishops as bishop-elect, before consecration: ibid., nos. 289-293, 382.
Kemp, English Episcopal Acta 37, Appendix 1. This is an edition of the specifically episcopal documents. Given the nature of the edition of the acta as a whole it sensibly omits the sede vacante material and that relating to the election of a bishop.
Kemp, English Episcopal Acta 37, Appendix 1 no. 12.
Haut de page